Another wild set of games in Week 11 for the ACC, the championship race became even more complicated. Here's a current look at how the teams stack up with No. 14 Virginia and No. 15 Louisville losing. The Virginia vs. NC State game on September 6 was a non-conference game and does not count.
Georgia Tech and Virgina are at the top ahead of Pitt, SMU, Duke all with one conference loss. There are a few different paths for teams to lock a spot in the championship game. Louisville is close to elimination with a second loss.
Final opponents
Georgia Tech (5-1): at Boston College, Pitt, Georgia
Virginia (5-1): at Duke, Virginia Tech
Pitt (5-1): Notre Dame, at Georgia Tech, Miami
SMU (5-1): Louisville, at Cal
Duke (4-1): Virginia, at North Carolina, Wake Forest
Louisville(4-2): Clemson, at SMU, Kentucky
If Georgia Tech, Virginia, Pitt, SMU, and Duke all win out in ACC play: Georgia Tech vs. Virginia in title game.
| School | ACC | Pct. | For-Against | Overall | Pct. | For-Against | Home | Away | Neutral | Streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Georgia Tech | 5-1 | .833 | 193-152 | 8-1 | .889 | 324-208 | 5-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | L1 |
Virginia | 5-1 | .833 | 181-138 | 8-2 | .800 | 337-216 | 5-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | L1 |
SMU | 5-1 | .833 | 183-98 | 7-3 | .700 | 322-204 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | W2 |
Pitt | 5-1 | .833 | 227-139 | 7-2 | .778 | 357-196 | 4-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | W5 |
Duke | 4-1 | .800 | 192-129 | 5-4 | .556 | 317-262 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | L1 |
Louisville | 4-2 | .667 | 177-147 | 7-2 | .778 | 296-195 | 4-2 | 3-0 | 0-0 | L1 |
Miami | 3-2 | .600 | 149-89 | 7-2 | .778 | 296-135 | 6-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | W1 |
Wake Forest | 3-3 | .500 | 119-150 | 6-3 | .667 | 210-183 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | W1 |
California | 3-3 | .500 | 154-186 | 6-4 | .600 | 250-252 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | W1 |
Clemson | 3-4 | .429 | 214-169 | 4-5 | .444 | 251-202 | 2-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | W1 |
NC State | 2-3 | .400 | 170-181 | 5-4 | .556 | 292-275 | 4-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | W1 |
Virginia Tech | 2-3 | .400 | 124-148 | 3-6 | .333 | 219-267 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-1 | L1 |
North Carolina | 2-3 | .400 | 91-101 | 4-5 | .444 | 175-192 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | W2 |
Stanford | 2-5 | .286 | 122-212 | 3-7 | .300 | 175-291 | 3-1 | 0-6 | 0-0 | L3 |
Florida State | 1-5 | .167 | 156-159 | 4-5 | .444 | 330-189 | 4-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 | L1 |
Syracuse | 1-6 | .143 | 104-226 | 3-7 | .300 | 223-315 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 | L6 |
Boston College | 0-6 | .000 | 98-230 | 1-9 | .100 | 237-345 | 1-5 | 0-4 | 0-0 | L9 |
ACC Tiebreaker policy
According to the ACC's policy, if three or more teams are tied with the highest percentage of wins or two or more teams are tied with the second highest percentage of wins in league play, the following tiebreaker procedure goes into effect:
A. For a two-team tie, head-to-head competition between the two tied teams.
B. Win-percentage against all common opponents.
C. Win-percentage against common opponents based upon their order of finish (overall conference win percentage with ties broken) and proceeding through other common opponents based upon their order of finish.
D. Combined win-percentage of conference opponents.
E. The tied team with the highest ranking by the Team Rating Score metric provided by SportSource Analytics following the conclusion of regular-season games.
F. The participant shall be chosen by a draw as administered by the commissioner or commissioner's designee.
If three or more teams are tied atop the league standings, the following procedure will be used:
A. Combined head-to-head win-percentage among the tied teams if all tied teams are common opponents.
B. If all tied teams are not common opponents, the tied team that defeated each of the other tied teams.
C. Win percentage against all common opponents.
D. Win percentage against common opponents based upon their order of finish (overall conference win percentage, with ties broken) and proceeding through other common opponents based upon their order of finish.
E. Combined win-percentage of conference opponents.
F. The tied team with the highest-ranking by the Team Rating Score metric provided by SportSource Analytics following the conclusion of regular season games.
G. The participant shall be chosen by a draw as administered by the Commissioner or Commissioner's designee.
More college football news:
- Deion Sanders buyout, contract details as Colorado Buffaloes coach
- Brian Kelly buyout, contract details as LSU Tigers coach
- Heisman Trophy winner Travis Hunter suffers major blow during rookie season
- Will Lane Kiffin leave Ole Miss? What to know about latest rumors
- Beloved college football mascot diagnosed with cancer